When they finished, James spoke up. “Brothers,” he said, “listen to me. 14 Simon has described to us how God first intervened to choose a people for his name from the Gentiles. 15 The words of the prophets are in agreement with this, as it is written:
1 “‘After this I will return
and rebuild David’s fallen tent.
Its ruins I will rebuild,
and I will restore it,
17 that the rest of mankind may seek the Lord,
even all the Gentiles who bear my name,
says the Lord, who does these things’—
18 things known from long ago.
19 “It is my judgment, therefore, that we should not make it difficult for the Gentiles who are turning to God. 20 Instead we should write to them, telling them to abstain from food polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from the meat of strangled animals and from blood. 21 For the law of Moses has been preached in every city from the earliest times and is read in the synagogues on every Sabbath.” Acts 15:13-21
This is one of those passages that torments me in Acts. Another is rolling dice for a new apostle. I see Acts as a history of the early church that isn't to be taken in every instance as God's prescription to us as to how to make decisions for example. Isn't it possible that these guys sometimes got it wrong? Should our elders and deacons be picked by coin toss? And in this passage, should we tell people to partially follow the Levitical laws that Christ fulfilled?
Seventh Day Adventists elevate teachings by Ellen White that command certain Old Testament laws to still be followed today like Sabbath and unclean foods. Common dilemmas are, "Can we eat duck?" Jehovah Witnesses would die rather than be transfused quoting this passage and Leviticus 17:17 saying, "The life is in the blood." Eastern Orthodoxy follows the laws of not trimming beards in Leviticus 19:27 and 21:5. Mormons wear holy underwear based on Leviticus 16:4. Certain Church of God traditions celebrate the annual feasts while Messianic Jews observe circumcision customs, Sabbaths, festivals, and Kosher laws.
For James to negotiate a trade of circumcision for strangled animals with blood in them, sexual immorality, and food offered to idols looks like a midseason baseball trade where you trade a big-name player for three lesser players in order to dump salary. Circumcision came at a high cost - ouch! The others are avoided without pain. Let's take the win, right? Wrong. Peter said let's not lay a yoke on people that we ourselves couldn't bear and yet James is compromising here - I feel. Is this introducing the addition of the Law to certain factions of Christianity? I believe yes. No wonder Paul had to rebuke Peter later on. Paul penned these words to the Galatians who were mixing Leviticus with the New Covenant;
"It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery. You who are trying to be justified by the law have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen away from grace." Gal. 5:1,4
I think James dropped the ball here. Sounds like one of our elder or deacon meetings.